ABUIYAAD
Reports News Search
REPORT • Monday, 23 Oct 2023

Excerpts from ‘The Preaching of Islam’ by Thomas Arnold

Drawing upon hundreds of resources written in more than ten languages, British Orientalist scholar Thomas Walker Arnold (d. 1930) provides a picture of the spread of Islām different from that of modern loons and rabid Islām haters. Download as a file.
By Abu Iyaad


Table of Contents

1 — Introduction
2 — Crusaders Accept Islām After Being Robbed and Cheated by Fellow Christians
3 — Crusaders Abandon Negative Perceptions of Muslims and Accept Islām After Interactions
4 — Native Christians Welcomed Muslim Rule to Escape Tyranny of Fellow Christians
5 — Christian Copts of Egypt Welcomed the Rule of Muslims to Escape Byzantine Oppression
6 — The Christians of Arabia Willingly Accepted Islām and Aided Muslims Against the Persians
7 — Christians Preferring the Justice and Toleration of Islām to Escape Persecution by Christians
8 — Patriarch of Antioch (1199 AD): Muslims Sent by God to Establish Justice Among Christians
9 — Christians of Syria and Jordan Welcoming Muslim Armies With Profound Respect
10 — Islām Saved Christians From Self-Destruction and Oppression and Gave Them Security and Justice
11 — Christians Rushed to the Purity of Islāmic Monotheism From a ‘Bastard Oriental Christianity’
12 — Islām Spread Swiftly Through Removal of Superstition, Corruption and Injustice
13 — 20,000 Jews, Christians and Magians Accepted Islām After Death of Imām Aḥmad bin Ḥanbal
14 — What Attracted Christians to Islām and Led Them to Conversion
15 — The Spread of Islām to Persia: Zoroastrians Welcome Muslims as Deliverers From Tyranny
16 — The Spread of Islām to Spain: Warmly Welcomed by Persecuted Jews, Down-Trodden Slaves and Social Classes
17 — Conclusion

16. The Spread of Islām to Spain: Warmly Welcomed by Persecuted Jews, Down-Trodden Slaves and Social Classes

Arnold writes:[1]

In 711 the victorious Arabs introduced Islam into Spain: in 1502 an edict of Ferdinand and Isabella forbade the exercise of the Muhammadan religion throughout the kingdom.

During the centuries that elapsed between these two dates; Muslim Spain had written one of the brightest pages in the history of medieval Europe.

Her [i.e Islam] influence had passed through Provence into the other countries of Europe, bringing into birth a new poetry and a new culture, and it was from her that Christian scholars received what of Greek philosophy and science they had to stimulate their mental activity up to the time of the Renaissance.

But these triumphs of the civilised life—art and poetry, science and philosophy—we must pass over here and fix our attention on the religious condition of Spain under the Muslim rule.

When the Muhammadans first brought their religion into Spain they found Catholic Christianity firmly established after its conquest over Arianism. The sixth Council of Toledo had enacted that all kings were to swear that they would not suffer the exercise of any other religion but the Catholic, and would vigorously enforce the law against all dissentients, while a subsequent law forbade any one under pain of confiscation of his property and perpetual imprisonment, to call in question the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, the Evangelical Institutions, the definitions of the Fathers, the decrees of the Church, and the Holy Sacraments.

The clergy had gained for their order a preponderating influence in the affairs of the state;[2] the bishops and chief ecclesiastics sat in the national councils, which met to settle the most important business of the realm, ratified the election of the king and claimed the right to depose him if he refused to abide by their decrees.

The Christian clergy took advantage of their power to persecute the Jews, who formed a very large community in Spain; edicts of a brutally severe character were passed against such as refused to be baptised;[3] and they consequently hailed the invading Arabs as their deliverers from such cruel oppression, they garrisoned the captured cities on behalf of the conqueror and opened the gates of towns that were being besieged.[4]

The Muhammadans received as warm a welcome from the slaves, whose condition under the Gothic rule was a very miserable one, and whose knowledge of Christianity was too superficial to have any weight when compared with the liberty and numerous advantages they gained, by throwing in their lot with the Muslims.

These down-trodden slaves were the first converts to Islam in Spain. The remnants of the heathen population of which we find mention as late as A.D. 693,[5] probably followed their example. Many of the Christian nobles, also, whether from genuine conviction or from other motives, embraced the new creed.[6]

Many converts were won, too, from the lower and middle classes, who may well have embraced Islam, not merely outwardly, but from genuine conviction, turning to it from a religion whose ministers had left them ill-instructed and uncared for, and busied with worldly ambitions had plundered and oppressed their flocks.[7]

Having once become Muslims, these Spanish converts showed themselves zealous adherents of their adopted faith, and they and their children joined themselves to the Puritan party of the rigid Muhammadan theologians as against the careless and luxurious life of the Arab aristocracy.[8]

At the time of the Muhammadan conquest the old Gothic virtues are said by Christian historians to have declined and given place to effeminacy and corruption, so that the Muhammadan rule appeared to them to be a punishment sent from God on those who had gone astray into the paths of vice...[9]

The toleration of the Muhammadan government towards its Christian subjects in Spain and the freedom of inter¬course between the adherents of the two religions brought about a certain amount of assimilation in the two communities. Inter-marriages became frequent;[10] Isidore of Beja, who fiercely inveighs against the Muslim conquerors, records the marriage of 'Abd al-'Azīz, the son of Mūsā, with the widow of King Roderic, without a word of blame.[11]

Many of the Christians adopted Arab names, and in outward observances imitated to some extent their Muhammadan neighbours, e.g. many were circumcised,[12] and in matters of food and drink followed the practice of the "unbaptized pagans..."[13]

From such close intercourse with the Muslims and so diligent a study of their literature—when we find even so bigoted an opponent of Islam as Alvar[14] acknowledging that the Qur'ān was composed in such eloquent and beautiful language that even Christians could not help reading and admiring it... What deep roots Islam had struck in the hearts of the Spanish people may be judged from the fact that when the last remnant of the Moriscoes was expelled from Spain in 1610, these unfortunate people still clung to the faith of their fathers, although for more than a century they had been forced to outwardly conform to the Christian religion, and in spite of the emigrations that had taken place since the fall of Granada, nearly 500,000 are said to have been expelled at that time.[15] Whole towns and villages were deserted and the houses fell into ruins, there being no one to rebuild them.[16]

These Moriscoes were probably all descendants of the original inhabitants of the country, with little or no admixture of Arab blood; the reasons that may be adduced in support of this statement are too lengthy to be given here; one point only in the evidence may be mentioned, derived from a letter written in 1311, in which it is stated that of the 200,000 Muhammadans then living in the city of Granada, not more than 500 were of Arab descent, all the rest being descendants of converted Spaniards.[17]



Footnotes
1. The Preaching of Islam (1896), p.177 onwards.
2. Baudissin, p. 22.
3. Helfferich, p. 68.
4. Makkarī, vol. i. pp. 280-2.
5. Baudissin, p. 7.
6. Dozy (2), tome ii. pp. 45-6.
7. A. Müller, vol. ii. p. 463.
8. Dozy (2), tome ii. pp. 44-6.
9. So St. Boniface (A.D. 745, Epist. lxii.). (pp. 531-2).
10. See the letter of Pope Hadrian I to the Spanish bishops : (Migne : Patr. Lat., tome xcviii. p. 385.)
11. Isidori Pacensis Chronicon, § 42 (p. 1266).
12. Alvar: Indic. Lum., § 35 (p. 53). John of Gorz, § 123 (p. 303).
13. Letter of Hadrian I, p. 385. John of Gorz, § 123 (p. 303).
14. Alvar: Ind. Lum.. § 29. (Migne : Patr. Lat., tome cxxi. p. 546.)
15. Lea, The Moriscos, p. 259.
16. Morgan, vol. ii. p. 337.
17. Id. p. 289.




© Abu Iyaad — Benefits in dīn and dunyā

Search

Enter your search term and hit enter.