Those who follow the secular laws which Shayṭān has legislated upon the tongues of his allies, in opposition to what Allāh, the Majestic and Elevated...

Racist, ethnosupremacist, bloodthirsty Jews—who are denounced by other Jews—present a justification for the slaughter of children which they have inherited from Pharoah and his nightmares and which is reflected in their psychotic war jurisprudence.

New inventions have appeared and claims have been made by the propounders of new theories [regarding which] people are divided into two categories...

This Sabaʾite movement was the nucleus for both the Rāfiḍah Shīʿah and the Khārijites and it played a role in the dissension and civil strife that occured between the Prophet's Companions.

The absence of grounding in Islāmic sciences that would have balanced his philosophy and polemics and kept him within the limits of safety and respectability, has led him to much sin and transgression...

It is obligatory to know that the correct intention is that we fight for the sake of defending Islām in our country, or for our country because it is an Islāmic country, and not for pure nationalism.

Its summary is that “There is no contagion” is upon its apparent meaning, and that the command to flee from the leper is carried upon recommendation...

When the swine fever or swine flu broke out, some people would only walk around wearing a niqāb or face mask, or other than that.

What is the ruling on instituting secular laws? And is it permissible to act by them? And does a ruler become a disbeliever by instituting these laws?

This person asks about the Sharīʿah ruling concerning the ruler who rules by the French secular laws alongside the knowledge that he claims Islām, prays, fasts and makes hajj.