Islam saved Jewry. This is an unpopular, discomforting claim in the modern world. But it is a historical truth. The argument for it is double.

A large number of Jews had congregated in and around Madīnah (originally, Yathrib) as they were expecting the arrival of a Prophet mentioned in their books...

In the Sharīʿah of Islām, fighting is legislated as a necessity to remove aggression and hostility shown towards peaceful preaching and conveyance of the message.

This person asks about the Sharīʿah ruling concerning the ruler who rules by the French secular laws alongside the knowledge that he claims Islām, prays, fasts and makes hajj.

The one who banishes the Shari’ah entirely and puts another law in its place, that this indicates that he views the [secular] law to be better than the Sharīʿah...

Is there a difference between a specific issue in which the qāḍī (judge) passes judgement with other than what Allāh revealed and between issues that are considered general legislation.

It is clear that there is no difference between ruling in a matter, or ten or a hundred or a thousand, or less or greater than that.

Taḥkīm [making a law a reference point] is unlawful when it is based upon a false (bāṭil) Sharīʿah which opposes the Book and the Sunnah.

A statement of Ibj Jibrīn overlooked and not given any attention by the Takfīriyyah, Quṭbiyyah, Surūriyyah whose methodology is blanket takfīr of rulers, governments and inciting youth to revolt.

Shaykh Ibn ʿUthaymīn clarifies his position on the issue of the rulers instituting secular laws, replacing the Sharīʿah with them and when takfīr can be made of them.