ABUIYAAD
Reports News Search
Shaykh ʿUbayd Al-Jābirī on Investigating the One Whose Condition Is Unknown or Hidden

Posted by Abu Iyaad
Translated November 2002
Filed under Manhaj



Shaykh Ubayd al-Jābirī (رحمه الله) was asked:

When the condition of a man is unknown, or hidden (mastoor ul-hāl), and nothing is known about him, is it permissible to ask about him in order to know his condition, or is it not permissible?

Shaykh ‘Ubayd (رحمه الله) answered:[1]

There is no doubt that in every time and in every place [it often occurs that] a person who is not known comes to the people. And this person who is not known, if he is one who remains silent and is reserved, and does not manifest any opposition, then he remains hidden [mastūr].

However, when the people have doubts about this man or they desire anything of the (worldly or religious) affairs from him, then it is their right to investigate into his condition.

Amongst the evidences for this is what Muslim and others have reported from Muʿāwiyah bin al-Hakam (رضي الله عنه), that he used to have a female slave who used to tend to the flock of sheep. And then a wolf came and snatched a sheep from the flock. Muʿāwiyah came and slapped her, and then this became heavy upon him. So he went to the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) and informed him of the incident. He said, “Bring her to me so I can see if she is a believer or not?” So he brought her, and the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) said, “Where is Allāh?” She said, “Above the heaven”. He said to her, “Who am I?” She said, “You are the Messenger of Allāh”. He said, “Free her, for she is a believer”.

And in the distant past, they–meaning the Scholars–used to say, “Test the people of Madinah with Mālik bin Anas, and the people of Shām with al-Awzāʿī, and the people of Miṣr with al-Layth bin Saʿd, and the people of Mawṣul with Muʿāfī bin ʿImrān”.

Hence, when doubts arise about a person, or something of the affairs is desired from him, then he is to be tested (examined).

And this is a matter that the people cannot do without, until even in their dealings with each other. If a man was to propose to a woman, then they are required to ask about his condition. Is he a person whose religion and character is pleasing, or not? This is necessary, and it is not to be said that there is nothing known about this person.

So by this, the falsehood of the statement, “The basis with respect to a person is ‘adālah (uprightness, integrity)” becomes clear. The affair is not like this. This statement is falsehood, and the books of al-Jarh wat-Taʿdīl are a witness to what we say.

If the original basis with respect to Muslims was that they are all upright, sound, trustworthy (‘adālah), then the people would not have required Scholars and Imāms who disparaged whom they disparaged and gave appraisal to those whom they appraised.



Footnotes
1. From the recorded lecture: "Jināyah al-Tamayyuʿ ʿalā al-Manhaj al-Salafī" which I translated in late 2002 during the fitnah of Abū al-Ḥasan al-Miṣrī.

Join our mailing list to receive content updates.



© Abu Iyaad — Benefits in dīn and dunyā

Search

Enter your search term and hit enter.